2002 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Willys-Overland |
| Model | Dingo | Aero-Willys 2600 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 2638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |
