2002 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1979 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Celica weights approximately 10 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Dingo | Celica |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2640 mm |
