2002 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 1980 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo weights approximately 635 kg more than 1980 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Suzuki Cervo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 1980 Suzuki Cervo has manual transmission. 1980 Suzuki Cervo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | 1980 Suzuki Cervo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
| Model | Dingo | Cervo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |
