2002 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo weights approximately 5 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Dingo | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 73 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2630 mm |
