2002 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 2008 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2008 Smart ForTwo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | 2008 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Smart |
| Model | Dingo | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 2730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1870 mm |
