2002 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 2013 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2013 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 340 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Suzuki Kizashi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | 2013 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
| Model | Dingo | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1481 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
