2002 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 435 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi eK | 1994 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Plymouth |
Model | eK | Colt |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2530 mm |