2002 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 658 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Subaru R2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 2003 Subaru R2 has manual transmission. 2003 Subaru R2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi eK | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
Model | eK | R2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2370 mm |