2002 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2010 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2010 Renault Scenic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Scenic weights approximately 530 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 2010 Renault Scenic has manual transmission. 2010 Renault Scenic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi eK | 2010 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | eK | Scenic |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2690 mm |