2002 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2011 Ford F-450
To start off, 2011 Ford F-450 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Ford F-450 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi eK | 2011 Ford F-450 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | eK | F-450 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 6700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 399 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 6680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2438 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2024 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 4379 mm |
