2002 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2011 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2011 GMC Acadia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Acadia weights approximately 1322 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi eK | 2011 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Mitsubishi | GMC |
Model | eK | Acadia |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1986 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3020 mm |