2002 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Fit weights approximately 355 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 2013 Honda Fit has manual transmission. 2013 Honda Fit will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi eK | 2013 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Honda |
| Model | eK | Fit |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2500 mm |
