2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 216 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer (383 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
Model | Lancer | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 383 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 64 L |