2002 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 945 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Minica | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Minica | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2649 mm |