2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 129 more horse power than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. (113 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. (270 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2009 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
Model | Space Liner | UTE |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |