2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2003 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Space Wagon | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2850 mm |