2002 Mitsubishi SUP vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi SUP would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-150 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi SUP weights approximately 150 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-150 (339 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. (240 Nm). This means 2010 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi SUP | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | SUP | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4717 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 72 L |
