2002 Mitsubishi Verada vs. 1983 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Verada is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Verada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mitsubishi Verada (208 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Verada should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Verada weights approximately 550 kg more than 1983 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Verada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mitsubishi Verada (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Mitsubishi Verada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 2101. 2002 Mitsubishi Verada has automatic transmission and 1983 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1983 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Verada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: