2002 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Morgan 4 would be higher. Both 2002 Morgan 4 and 2010 Holden Cruze are equipped with a 1,796 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2002 Morgan 4. (112 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2002 Morgan 4.
Because 2002 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Morgan 4. (160 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Morgan 4 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Morgan | Holden |
Model | 4 | Cruze |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2685 mm |