2002 Morgan 4 vs. 2011 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2011 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler Voyager (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2002 Morgan 4. (112 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2002 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 1140 kg more than 2002 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler Voyager (359 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Morgan 4. (160 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Morgan 4. 2011 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 2002 Morgan 4 has manual transmission. 2002 Morgan 4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Morgan 4 | 2011 Chrysler Voyager | |
| Make | Morgan | Chrysler |
| Model | 4 | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 112 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 2110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5151 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1999 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3078 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 76 L |
