2002 Nissan Avenir vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Avenir. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Avenir would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 337 kg more than 2002 Nissan Avenir.
Because 2002 Nissan Avenir is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac XTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Avenir will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan Avenir | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Avenir | XTS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2837 mm |