2002 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 640 kg more than 2002 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Bluebird | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |