2002 Nissan Cima vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Cima weights approximately 274 kg more than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2002 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Nissan Cima | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Cima | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4498 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1496 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1725 mm |
