2002 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Nissan Pathfinder. (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan Pathfinder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 14 kg more than 2002 Nissan Pathfinder. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan Pathfinder. (359 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan Pathfinder | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Pathfinder | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1964 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 76 L |