2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 (543 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 454 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 66 kg more than 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | R 390 GT1 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 543 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 637 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |