2002 Nissan Terrano II vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2002 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,988 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan Terrano II (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 476 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan Terrano II (314 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan Terrano II | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Terrano II | Renown |
Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1284 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2750 mm |