2002 Nissan Terrano II vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 2002 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 390 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 2002 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Nissan Terrano II | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Nissan | Riley |
| Model | Terrano II | RM A |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2389 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2870 mm |
