2002 Nissan Terrano II vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2002 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan Terrano II (143 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 658 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan Terrano II (334 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan Terrano II | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Terrano II | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2956 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 334 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 54 L |