2002 Nissan Terrano II vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,988 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan Terrano II (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 434 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan Terrano II (314 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan Terrano II | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | Terrano II | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |