2002 Nissan Terrano II vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Terrano II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Terrano II would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 345 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 2002 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan Terrano II (334 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan Terrano II | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Terrano II | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2956 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |