2002 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. Both 2002 Nissan X-Trail and 2003 Nissan X-Trail are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 230 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 192 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan X-Trail | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | X-Trail | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |