2002 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2010 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.

Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (270 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2002 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: