2002 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 120 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Nissan X-Trail | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Nissan | Mini |
Model | X-Trail | Countryman |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4133 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 47 L |