2002 Oldsmobile Alero vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Oldsmobile Alero (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Oldsmobile Alero (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Oldsmobile Alero | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
| Model | Alero | 66 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
