2002 Oldsmobile Bravada vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (193 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada weights approximately 1056 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada (374 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (280 Nm). This means 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Oldsmobile Bravada | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
Model | Bravada | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2982 cc |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 944 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 87 L |