2002 Opel Frogster vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Frogster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Frogster would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Opel Frogster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Frogster | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Opel | Nissan |
Model | Frogster | Navara |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 972 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |