2002 Opel Frogster vs. 2011 Ford F-350
To start off, 2011 Ford F-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Frogster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Frogster would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 2002 Opel Frogster. (99 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Frogster.
Because 2011 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Opel Frogster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Frogster. (220 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Frogster.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Frogster | 2011 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Frogster | F-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 972 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |