2002 Opel Omega vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 953 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Omega | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Opel | Triumph |
Model | Omega | Herald |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1733 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 29 L |