2002 Opel Omega vs. 1976 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 810 kg more than 1976 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Opel Omega | 1976 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Opel | Zastava |
| Model | Omega | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2010 mm |
