2002 Opel Omega vs. 1986 Peugeot 205
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Peugeot 205. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Peugeot 205 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1986 Peugeot 205. (85 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1986 Peugeot 205.
Because 2002 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Peugeot 205. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Peugeot 205.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Omega | 1986 Peugeot 205 | |
Make | Opel | Peugeot |
Model | Omega | 205 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |