2002 Opel Omega vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 748 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (300 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Opel Omega | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Opel | Renault |
| Model | Omega | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1148 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 13 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1733 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
