2002 Opel Omega vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2008 Renault Clio. (137 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 483 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (300 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (195 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio. 2002 Opel Omega has automatic transmission and 2008 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2008 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Opel Omega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Omega | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Omega | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 10.1:1 |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1733 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |