2002 Opel Omega vs. 2011 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2011 Opel Meriva is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2011 Opel Meriva. (94 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2011 Opel Meriva.
Because 2002 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Meriva. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Omega | 2011 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Opel | Opel |
Model | Omega | Meriva |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |