2002 Opel Omega vs. 2011 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2011 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Omega | 2011 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Opel | Proton |
Model | Omega | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2610 mm |