2002 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 186 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (149 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (300 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Opel Omega | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Opel | Audi |
| Model | Omega | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.5 seconds | 4.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
