2002 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (300 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Omega | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Opel | Audi |
Model | Omega | TT |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |