2002 Opel Vectra vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 2002 Opel Vectra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Opel Vectra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Volvo 144 (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2002 Opel Vectra. (99 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Volvo 144 should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Vectra.
Because 1966 Volvo 144 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo 144. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Opel Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Vectra (251 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Vectra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Opel Vectra | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Opel | Volvo |
Model | Vectra | 144 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |