2002 Peugeot 106 vs. 2008 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2008 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot 106 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot 106. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Falcon weights approximately 924 kg more than 2002 Peugeot 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot 106. (88 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot 106. 2008 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2002 Peugeot 106 has manual transmission. 2002 Peugeot 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot 106 | 2008 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Peugeot | Ford |
Model | 106 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 362 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 533 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 99.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 68 L |