2002 Peugeot 206 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2002 Peugeot 206 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Peugeot 206 (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 Peugeot 206.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 94 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot 206 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Peugeot | Riley |
Model | 206 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2380 mm |