2002 Peugeot 306 vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot 306. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot 306 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A3 (140 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot 306. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot 306.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot 306. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot 306.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot 306 | 2010 Audi A3 | |
Make | Peugeot | Audi |
Model | 306 | A3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |